The methodReceipts v1.0EJ-1CorrectionsRepublish usRSSSubscribe
MemoryHoleHesitation Media

Every claim graded, with the receipt behind it and the one thing that would prove it wrong.

Republished · The Conversation US

New website tracks how Pennsylvania's $2.2B in opioid settlement funds is being spent

A county-level tracker of Pennsylvania's $2.2 billion in opioid settlement money, built by researchers at three Pennsylvania universities rather than by a newsroom. It is the tool our own settlement reporting keeps wanting to exist, and the people who built it wrote up how and why. Their disclosure matters here and travels with the piece: all four authors report funding from the Pennsylvania Opioid Misuse and Addiction Abatement Trust, which is to say the body distributing the money being tracked.

Staged — not published

This page is built and not live. Republication is reader-facing publication and is Ask-first, so it waits on a per-piece sign-off rather than shipping on a build. The article body is deliberately absent: The Conversation US requires its tracking code preserved and forbids edits, so the text must be copied from their own "Republish This Story" tool rather than reassembled from the page — reassembling it would strip the tracking and risk an edit the license does not allow.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence. Authors are credited with their institutions, at Temple University, Penn State and the University of Pittsburgh. Originally published by The Conversation US on . Read it at the source: https://theconversation.com/new-website-tracks-how-pennsylvanias-2-2b-in-opioid-settlement-funds-is-being-spent-263765

Reproduced under CC BY-ND 4.0 (site-wide policy; not confirmed at the article level). Terms re-read . The canonical link on this page points at The Conversation US and the page is marked noindex: the search credit belongs to whoever did the reporting.

License compliance

License
CC BY-ND 4.0 (site-wide policy; not confirmed at the article level), verified July 21, 2026
Required credit
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence. Authors are credited with their institutions, at Temple University, Penn State and the University of Pittsburgh.
Images
Excluded. Every outlet checked for this section carves photographs, illustrations and graphics out of its grant. None are reproduced here.
Edits
None. The license permits changes only for relative time, location and house style, and none were needed.
Tracking code
Required by The Conversation US and preserved. This is why the body comes from their republication tool.
Record of the grant
NOT CONFIRMED, 2026-07-21. No Republish button, Creative Commons badge or licence text was found on this specific article page, and the article's republish endpoint returns 404. The Conversation's site-wide guidelines do state CC BY-ND 4.0, but a site-wide policy is not a grant: the per-piece mechanism is the licence check. This piece cannot go live until the button is confirmed present in a browser. If it is absent, the piece is dropped.
Selection
Chosen and read individually. Every license surveyed forbids wholesale or automated republication, and this section is not a feed.

Body sourceThe Conversation's per-article Republish button, which supplies their 1x1 page-view counter. Their terms require that counter when republishing online. Not yet obtainable, see above.